§ Method · how verdicts are earned here

Methodology

This site checks a video's claims against official records. The rules below are the whole method — if a page ever violates one, that page is wrong.

§ M.1 The verdict scale

BadgeMeaning
TrueThe claim matches the record on its own terms.
Mostly trueAccurate core, wrong or exaggerated at the edges.
MisleadingContains true facts arranged to support a conclusion the record does not.
FalseThe claim contradicts the record.
OpinionNot fact-checkable as stated; evaluated only if converted into measurable indicators.
Not yet verifiedCheckable, but this site has not yet committed the data to check it.
The six classifications. A verdict may only ship when it is derivable from the committed dataset.

§ M.2 The three registers

Every claim page separates its prose into three typographically distinct registers, so a reader always knows which epistemic ground a sentence stands on:

Finding — what the record shows

Statements a stranger could re-derive from the committed dataset or a cited document.

Interpretation — what can be inferred

Economic reasoning on top of findings. Plausible, argued, and labelled as inference.

Opinion — not fact-checkable

Value judgments and rhetoric — the video's and anyone else's — quarantined and tagged.

§ M.3 Source hierarchy

Ranked. A claim page cites the highest-ranked source available; a lower rank never overrules a higher one on the same fact.

  1. Deutsche Finanzagentur — the issuer's own auction results and procedures (primary for all auction facts).
  2. Deutsche Bundesbank — tender result notices, statistics, monthly reports.
  3. ECB, Bundesministerium der Finanzen, US Treasury, Destatis, Eurostat — official European, federal and foreign-government statistics.
  4. OECD, IMF — international official data.
  5. Bloomberg, Reuters, Financial Times, TradingView — market data and reporting, used only where no official series exists, and marked as such.

§ M.4 Working rules

§ M.5 Known limits