Never proclaim yourself a philosopherφιλόσοφοςphilosophosThe philosopherNot an academic: a person in training to live by what reason concludes. ‘Never proclaim yourself a philosopher — show it by actions.’, nor make much talk among the ignorant about your principles, but show them by actions. Thus, at an entertainment, do not discourse how people ought to eat, but eat as you ought. For remember that thus Socrates also universally avoided all ostentation. And when persons came to him and desired to be introduced by him to philosophers, he took them and introduced them; so well did he bear being overlooked. So if ever there should be among the ignorant any discussion of principles, be for the most part silent. For there is great danger in hastily throwing out what is undigested. And if anyone tells you that you know nothing, and you are not nettled at it, then you may be sure that you have really entered on your work. For sheep do not hastily throw up the grass to show the shepherds how much they have eaten, but, inwardly digesting their food, they produce it outwardly in wool and milk. Thus, therefore, do you not make an exhibition before the ignorant of your principles, but of the actions to which their digestion gives rise.
Part VI of VI · Sections 46–51
The Final Posture
προκοπή prokopē — “progress”
Show it by actions, not talk: the marks of the proficient, the end of procrastination, and the maxims to keep ready at hand.
When you have learned to nourish your body frugally, do not pique yourself upon it; nor, if you drink water, be saying upon every occasion, “I drink water.” But first consider how much more frugal are the poor than we, and how much more patient of hardship. If at any time you would inure yourself by exercise to labor and privation, for your own sake and not for the public, do not attempt great feats; but when you are violently thirsty, just rinse your mouth with water, and tell nobody.
The condition and characteristic of a vulgar person is that he never looks for either help or harm from himself, but only from externalsτὰ ἐκτόςta ektosExternalsEverything outside the will: the body, money, reputation, office, other people’s conduct. Not evil — raw material. The mistake is looking to them for help or harm.. The condition and characteristic of a philosopherφιλόσοφοςphilosophosThe philosopherNot an academic: a person in training to live by what reason concludes. ‘Never proclaim yourself a philosopher — show it by actions.’ is that he looks to himself for all help or harm. The marks of a proficientπροκοπήprokopēProgressThe state between fool and sage where every actual Stoic lives. The proficient blames no one, explains himself to no one, and keeps watch over himself ‘as over an enemy in ambush.’ are that he censures no one, praises no one, blames no one, accuses no one; says nothing concerning himself as being anybody or knowing anything. When he is in any instance hindered or restrained, he accuses himself; and if he is praised, he smiles to himself at the person who praises him; and if he is censured, he makes no defense. But he goes about with the caution of a convalescent, careful of interference with anything that is doing well but not yet quite secure. He restrains desire; he transfers his aversion to those things only which thwart the proper use of our own will; he employs his energies moderately in all directions; if he appears stupid or ignorant, he does not care; and, in a word, he keeps watch over himself as over an enemy and one in ambush.
When anyone shows himself vain on being able to understand and interpret the works of Chrysippus, say to yourself: “Unless Chrysippus had written obscurely, this person would have had nothing to be vain of. But what do I desireὄρεξιςorexisDesireThe reaching-out toward a thing as good. The beginner is told to suspend it entirely: desire aimed at externals is disappointment on a schedule.? To understand nature, and follow her. I ask, then, who interprets her; and hearing that Chrysippus does, I have recourse to him. I do not understand his writings. I seek, therefore, one to interpret them.” So far there is nothing to value myself upon. And when I find an interpreter, what remains is to make use of his instructions. This alone is the valuable thing. But if I admire merely the interpretation, what do I become more than a grammarian, instead of a philosopherφιλόσοφοςphilosophosThe philosopherNot an academic: a person in training to live by what reason concludes. ‘Never proclaim yourself a philosopher — show it by actions.’, except, indeed, that instead of Homer I interpret Chrysippus? When anyone, therefore, desires me to read Chrysippus to him, I rather blush when I cannot exhibit actions that are harmonious and consonant with his discourse.
Whatever rules you have adopted, abide by them as laws, and as if you would be impious to transgress them; and do not regard what anyone says of you, for this, after all, is no concern of yours. How long, then, will you delay to demand of yourself the noblest improvementsπροκοπήprokopēProgressThe state between fool and sage where every actual Stoic lives. The proficient blames no one, explains himself to no one, and keeps watch over himself ‘as over an enemy in ambush.’, and in no instance to transgress the judgments of reason? You have received the philosophicφιλόσοφοςphilosophosThe philosopherNot an academic: a person in training to live by what reason concludes. ‘Never proclaim yourself a philosopher — show it by actions.’ principles with which you ought to be conversant; and you have been conversant with them. For what other master, then, do you wait as an excuse for this delay in self-reformation? You are no longer a boy but a grown man. If, therefore, you will be negligent and slothful, and always add procrastination to procrastination, purpose to purpose, and fix day after day in which you will attend to yourself, you will insensibly continue to accomplish nothing and, living and dying, remain of vulgar mind. This instant, then, think yourself worthy of living as a man grown up and a proficient. Let whatever appears to be the best be to you an inviolable law. And if any instance of pain or pleasure, glory or disgrace, be set before you, remember that now is the combat, now the Olympiad comes on, nor can it be put off; and that by one failure and defeat honor may be lost or—won. Thus Socrates became perfect, improving himself by everything, following reason alone. And though you are not yet a Socrates, you ought, however, to live as one seeking to be a Socrates.
The first and most necessary topic in philosophyφιλόσοφοςphilosophosThe philosopherNot an academic: a person in training to live by what reason concludes. ‘Never proclaim yourself a philosopher — show it by actions.’ is the practical application of principles, as, We ought not to lie; the second is that of demonstrations as, Why it is that we ought not to lie; the third, that which gives strength and logical connection to the other two, as, Why this is a demonstration. For what is demonstration? What is a consequence? What a contradiction? What truth? What falsehood? The third point is then necessary on account of the second; and the second on account of the first. But the most necessary, and that whereon we ought to rest, is the first. But we do just the contrary. For we spend all our time on the third point and employ all our diligence about that, and entirely neglect the first. Therefore, at the same time that we lie, we are very ready to show how it is demonstrated that lying is wrong.
Upon all occasions we ought to have these maxims ready at hand:
Conduct me, Zeus, and thou, O Destiny,
Wherever your decrees have fixed my lot.
I follow cheerfully; and, did I not,
Wicked and wretched, I must follow still.
Who’er yields properly to Fate is deemed
Wise among men, and knows the laws of Heaven.
And this third:
“O Crito, if it thus pleases the gods, thus let it be.” “Anytus and Melitus may kill me indeed; but hurt me they cannot.”