Menu

Verse 10 of 30 Layer 3: Senses

Universal and specific factors

初遍行觸等 次別境謂欲 勝解念定慧 所緣事不同

First, the universals (sarvatraga): contact and the rest. Next, the object-specific (viniyata): desire (chanda), resolve (adhimokṣa), mindfulness, concentration, wisdom — each engaging a different objective basis.

Triṃśikā, verse 10 · from Xuanzang's Chinese · tr. Claude (Anthropic), 2026

The five universals (sarvatraga) are present in every cognitive moment. The five object-specifics (viniyata) only show up in particular operations. Reading them together gives a precise picture of what Vasubandhu thinks any single moment of cognition is made of — and what additional cognitive resources can be brought to bear when conditions invite them.

filter_alt Five Lenses

memory

The Distributed Systems Engineer

DSE

Treats alaya as an append-only log, manas as a hot cache, the six senses as consumers.

The universals are the minimum runtime: every moment of cognition runs the five-step pipeline of contact → attention → sensation → perception → volition. There is no cognition without this loop; it is the main() of an experiential tick.

The object-specifics are conditional modules:

  • desire (chanda) — engagement, interest
  • resolve (adhimokṣa) — commitment to a content
  • mindfulness (smṛti) — retention of a content over time
  • concentration (samādhi) — one-pointedness
  • wisdom (prajñā) — discernment between similar contents

Each loads only when needed. Yogācāra’s separation of universal from object-specific is exactly what a thoughtful runtime designer would do.

Draft not yet reviewed
hub

The Cynefin Practitioner

CYN

Maps each verse to Clear, Complicated, Complex, Chaotic, or Confused.

The five universals describe a sense-making loop: encounter, orient, feel, interpret, act. This is the basic Cynefin operating cycle (probe-sense-respond, observe-orient-decide-act). Vasubandhu spelled it out in five steps in the 4th century.

The five object-specifics are the higher cognitive controls that Cynefin literature would call “deliberate practice”: desire, resolve, mindfulness, concentration, wisdom. These can be cultivated; the universals cannot.

Draft not yet reviewed
psychology

The Cognitive Scientist

COG

Reads through predictive processing, Bayesian inference, and self-model theory.

The universals are an excellent description of the perceptual-motor cycle:

  1. Contact (sparśa) — afferent input.
  2. Attention (manaskāra) — selection / salience.
  3. Sensation (vedanā) — hedonic and somatic tagging.
  4. Perception (saṃjñā) — categorization.
  5. Volition (cetanā) — output to behavior.

This is essentially the standard contemporary model. The object-specifics map to executive functions: motivation (chanda), goal-locking (adhimokṣa), working memory (smṛti), sustained attention (samādhi), discrimination (prajñā).

Yogācāra was doing cognitive psychology.

Draft not yet reviewed
water_drop

The Process Philosopher

PRO

Whitehead, Heraclitus, Bergson — reality as flow, not substance.

The five universals form a single occasion, not five sequential operations. Whitehead would call them aspects of one concrescence. Reading them as a pipeline is useful for analysis but obscures their simultaneity in any actual moment.

Draft not yet reviewed
report_problem

The Skeptic

SKP

Mandatory on every verse. Names where the metaphors break.

Don’t take “always present” too literally. Some Yogācāra sub-schools dispute which factors are truly universal. The list is a high-confidence default, not an axiomatic foundation. Smṛti in particular shades between “memory” and “mindfulness”; the English translation choice matters more than it looks.

Draft not yet reviewed